/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) switch reference (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

---

1) Candidate: switch reference

Is in goldstandard

---

1
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : The following section presents the results of the current study. First, however, it is important to note some methodological modifications made to the dataset after the initial coding took place. Due to low token counts for some of the categories, these were collapsed. Specifically, the category partial switch was moved to the switch category, and six of the nine TMA categories of perfect, present subjunctive, past subjunctive, synthetic future, periphrastic future, and conditional were collapsed into a single category named All other TMAs (see ^[210]Lastra and Martín Butragueño, 2015, for similar methods). For the multivariate analysis, then, Switch Reference comprised same and switch, and TMA included four levels: Present, Preterit, Imperfect, and All Other TMAs .^[211]^6

---

2
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : Although the interaction between TMA and switch reference was not significant for 1sg as presented above, results for third-person pronouns from the interaction term TMA:switch reference did reveal a statistically significant effect (p < 0 .05). As seen in [256]Table 8, while the same/switch distinction is not substantial for present, preterit, and All Other TMAs, there is a stark contrast between same and switch for the Imperfect (% difference of 39%). Thus, overt SPs are much more likely to occur with verbs in the imperfect when there is also a switch in subject referent, consistent with previous studies that have examined this interaction (^[257]Cameron, 1994; ^[258]Shin, 2014)^[259]^10. Put another way, overt SPs are favored in switch reference contexts, especially for imperfects. In fact, 59% of switches in the imperfect are overt, making it one of the few variable contexts in which the production of overt SPs outweighs that of null SPs (59% overt vs. 41% null).

---

3
paper CO_Lenguajetxt181 - : This section will address some additional comparisons that are notable between 1sg and 3rd-person SPE for the current data. [260]Table 9 below shows a comparison of the constraint hierarchies for 1sg and 3rd-person (repeated from above). Regarding switch reference, this factor shows a stronger effect for 1sg (range = 26) than for 3rd-person (range = 14), with 1sg usage in switch reference contexts nearly double that of same reference (49% vs. 25%, respectively). 3rd-person, by contrast, shows a narrower difference of 31% overt with switch and 21% overt with same reference. Thus, these two different grammatical persons respond to switch reference to differing degrees: switch reference, then, impacts different persons differently .

Evaluando al candidato switch reference:

1) overt: 7
3) imperfect: 4 (*)
4) contexts: 3
6) interaction: 3 (*)
7) category: 3 (*)

switch reference
Lengua: eng
Frec: 42
Docs: 4
Nombre propio: 1 / 42 = 2%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 3
Puntaje: 3.839 = (3 + (1+4.39231742277876) / (1+5.4262647547021)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

switch reference

: Cameron, R. (1994). Switch Reference, Verb Class and Priming in a Variable Syntax. In Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory, 30, 27-45. : Cameron, R. (1995). The scope and limits of switch reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6(7), 1-27. : Pronouns]” (^[191]Lastra & Martín Butragueño, 2015, p. 46). In other words, there could be an interaction between the switch reference and polarity variable such that negative clauses disfavor overt SPs more frequently in coreferential contexts than in switch reference contexts. : Switch reference Disjoint reference [74]Bayley and Pease-Alvarez, 1997 (California) : Weber, D. J. (1980). Switch-Reference: Quechua. En P. Munro (ed.), Studies of switch reference. UCLA Papers in Syntax (vol. 8, pp. 48-64). Los Angeles: University of California.